Skip to main content

Trusted by leading ISVs and ecosystem partners

zscaler
cyble
Accounox
britive
broadcom
CloudBees
New Relic
Seclore
teradata
altair
avaamo
conviva
elastic
lavelle_network
piramal
qyuki
smfg
truveris
zscaler
cyble
Accounox
britive
broadcom
CloudBees
New Relic
Seclore
teradata
altair
avaamo
conviva
elastic
lavelle_network
piramal
qyuki
smfg
truveris
zscaler
cyble
Accounox
britive
broadcom
CloudBees
New Relic
Seclore
teradata
altair
avaamo
conviva
elastic
lavelle_network
piramal
qyuki
smfg
truveris
zscaler
cyble
Accounox
britive
broadcom
CloudBees
New Relic
Seclore
teradata
altair
avaamo
conviva
elastic
lavelle_network
piramal
qyuki
smfg
truveris
Agent Quality Assurance

Confidence in Every Agent Decision, Before It Reaches Production 

A traditional test checks whether a deterministic function returns the right output. An agent produces probabilistic outputs across multi-step reasoning chains, where a single wrong tool call in step three can corrupt the final answer in a way that passes every surface-level check. We built our evaluation approach specifically for that, covering task completion, tool call correctness, trajectory analysis, and regression detection when prompts or models change. 

Every Place an Agent Can Fail Without Failing the Test

We test reasoning, tools, memory, security, and cost together, then keep testing after the agent ships.

Defining what task success means for the specific agent, building a golden dataset from real production traffic, and combining deterministic checks with LLM-as-judge evaluation before the agent ships.

Evaluating every step of the reasoning chain, not just the final output. An agent that retrieves the right documents but misattributes a fact in step three has still failed, even if the final answer looks correct.

Validating that the agent selects the right tool, passes correctly structured arguments, and handles tool errors without cascading into a broken state, since a schema gap is a leading cause of real production failures.

Running the full evaluation suite whenever a prompt, model, tool, or retrieval system changes, so a behavioral regression is caught before it reaches production, not after a user reports it.

Sampling production outputs for human review, labeling quality dimensions automated checks can't measure, and using those labels to calibrate automated judges, the ground truth for helpfulness and nuanced correctness.

Tracking agent quality metrics after launch and surfacing regressions when real user inputs diverge from what the golden dataset covered, with production traces feeding back to keep the test suite current.

Simulating real-world attacks against agents: prompt injection, single- and multi-turn jailbreaks, prompt extraction, unauthorized tool access, privilege escalation, goal hijacking, excessive agency, insecure function calling, and sensitive data leakage.

Validating that agent actions produce correct real-world outcomes in the systems they operate on. A booking agent's confirmation must match the actual database record, not just the output text, verified across sandboxed and live environments.

Testing both sides of memory: that the right information is written, and that the right information is retrieved. Short-term testing checks context retention within a session; long-term testing checks that facts from prior sessions stay accurate and current.

Capturing full step-level traces across every tool call, model response, memory read and write, retrieval step, and decision branch, so trajectory evaluation has replay data and production regressions have a trace to debug against. 

Measuring token consumption, cost per task, and latency across the full execution trace, since a prompt change or model swap can raise cost significantly with no visible change in output quality.

A framework triggering multiple evaluators per input: security, environment, cost, memory, tool accuracy, retrieval quality, and coherence, each with its own pass/fail threshold. Prompts evolve based on past runs and integrate into CI/CD so quality gates run on every change.

Validating that the agent retrieves the correct information from its external knowledge store, distinct from memory. Covers retrieval accuracy, relevance of retrieved context, and cases where the right document exists but retrieval fails to surface it.

Running the same test dataset across different temperature and parameter configurations to find the optimal setup, since some agents need highly consistent responses and only meet quality within a narrow range.

Agent evaluation framework design
image

Defined Success Criteria

Know what "working" means
before you ship

Image

Real-World Test Data

Built from actual
production traffic

icon

Human Scoring

Deterministic checks paired
with judge evaluation

Multi-step trajectory evaluation
Image

Full Reasoning Visibility

See every step, not
just the final answer

image

Replayable Decisions

Reconstruct what
the agent did and why

icon

Early Error Detection

Catch mistakes before
they compound downstream

Tool call correctness testing
Image

Right Tool, Right Time

Validate selection logic
against real scenarios

icon

Schema-Level Validation

Arguments checked
before execution

image

Failure Handling

Tool errors contained,
not cascaded

Regression testing for prompt and model change
Image

Change-Triggered Testing

Every prompt or model
update runs the full suite

image

Before-and-After Comparison

Trajectories diffed,
not just outputs

icon

Pre-Production Confidence

Behavioral drift
caught before release

Human-in-the-loop evaluation design
icon

Expert Review at Scale

Sampled outputs
reviewed by people

image

Beyond Auto Metrics

Helpfulness and nuance
measured properly

Image

Self-Improving Judges

Human labels calibrate
automated scoring

Production monitoring and drift detection
Image

Quality Tracking

Metrics monitored
continuously after launch

icon

Input Shift Detection

Know when real usage
diverges from testing

image

Living Test Suite

Production traces feed
back into evaluation

Adversarial, Red Teaming, And Guardrail Testing
icon

Attack Simulation

Prompt injection and
jailbreak attempts tested

Image

Permission Boundary Test

Unauthorized tool
access blocked

image

Data Leak Prevention

Sensitive information
exposure caught early

Environment testing
icon

Outcome Verification

Database and file
state checked

Image

Safe Isolation

andbox testing before
anything touches production

image

Environment Consistency

Same behavior in
staging and live

Agent memory testing
icon

Accurate Storage

What gets written is
what actually happened

Image

Accurate Storage

Context retained
correctly across turns

image

Current Over Stale

Outdated facts updated,
not surfaced

Observability instrumentation for agent QA
Image

Execution Traces

Every tool call and
decision captured

icon

Debuggable Failures

Structured data to
investigate what broke

image

Open Standards

OpenTelemetry-based,
no vendor lock-in

Cost and token efficiency testing
image

Cost Attribution

Know exactly where
spend goes

icon

Regression Alerts

Catch expensive changes
before they ship

Image

Latency Profiling

Identify what's actually
slowing responses

Agent testing automation framework
icon

Parallel Evaluation

Multiple evaluators run
against every input

Image

Configurable Thresholds

Pass criteria tuned
per agent type

image

CI/CD Integration

Quality gates
on every change

Knowledge retrieval testing
Image

Retrieval Accuracy

Right source found
for every query

icon

Context Relevance

Retrieved content
scored for usefulness

image

Silent Failure Detection

Catch when the right
document is missed

Parameter and temperature testing
Image

Config Benchmarking

Same dataset across
parameter ranges

image

Evidence-Based Settings

Optimal config proven,
not guessed

image

Consistency Validation

Predictable output
where it matters

Service CTA Line

Whether your focus is CI/CD modernization, Platform Engineering,

Is Your Data Infrastructure Ready for What You're Building on Top of It?

Tell us what you're trying to build, we'll show you where the data layer needs work.

Built for Complexity. Engineered for Scale.

Building the technology capabilities that underpin enterprise scale and resilience.

Our Technology Ecosystem

zscaler
cyble
Accounox
Zscaler
cyble
Accounox
zscaler
cyble
Accounox
Zscaler
cyble
Accounox

Built for Answers That Have to Be Right

description

Whether you're in fintech, healthcare, legal, or hi-tech, we build the pipelines and governance your AI systems, dashboards, and applications all depend on without anyone noticing they're there. We work with engineering leads, data teams, and product owners who can't afford a pipeline that fails silently.

VP Engineering, CTO

Leaders responsible for AI systems the business can rely on.

Head of Product, Product Managers

Owners who need AI features that genuinely work for real users.

Data Engineers, AI/ML Engineers

Engineers building and maintaining the technical layer AI systems run on.

FinTech, HealthTech, LegalTech, Cybersecurity, Hi-Tech

Industries that depend on reliable, secure intelligent systems.

FAQs: Questions Worth Asking Before Making a Technology Decision

Strategic guidance to help technology leaders navigate complex technology questions, evaluate approaches, and address what matters most.

Yes. Opcito can evaluate an AI agent for production readiness across task completion, tool-call correctness, multi-step trajectories, security, memory, retrieval quality, cost, and real-world environment behavior. The evaluation combines deterministic checks with LLM-as-judge evaluation and can be integrated into CI/CD so quality gates run before the agent reaches production. 
 

Opcito evaluates non-deterministic agents by assessing the complete execution rather than relying only on an exact final answer. The approach evaluates task completion, tool calls, reasoning trajectories, retrieval, memory, security, and other quality dimensions using defined evaluation criteria and automated evaluators. 

Yes. Opcito evaluates the agent’s complete trajectory, including individual model responses, retrieval steps, tool calls, memory operations, and decision branches. This helps identify failures within the execution chain instead of evaluating only the final output. 

Yes. Opcito validates whether an agent selects the correct tool, sends correctly structured arguments, and handles tool failures without causing the workflow to enter an incorrect state. Tool-call testing is included as part of the broader agent evaluation framework. 

Opcito can run the complete agent evaluation suite whenever a prompt, model, tool, or retrieval component changes. This allows behavioral regressions to be identified before deployment and can connect evaluation quality gates with CI/CD workflows. 

Bring Us the Pipeline That's Holding Everything Else Back

We'll show you exactly what needs to change and build it.